Page 186 - AR BRIDS 2021 - FINAL - HIRES - 2903

Corporate Governance

Sanksi administratif yang
dikenakan pada Peru-
sahaan, Anggota Dewan
Komisaris dan Direksi
oleh Otoritas terkait pada
Pengaruh terhadap
Pokok Perkara Status Penyelesaian kondisi Perusahaan tahun buku terakhir
No. Administrative sanctions
Case Subject Mediation Status Impact on the
Company imposed on the Company,
Members of the Board
of Commissioners and
Board of Directors by the
relevant authorities in the
Latest Fiscal Year
Alleged Corruption in the During the preparation of this No impact on business There are no administrative
provision of financing facilities annual report, the ongoing legal activities and Company sanctions imposed on
from PT Danareksa Sekuritas process was that each of the activities considering the Company, the current
to the debtor PT Aditya Tirta convicts included the former that criminal acts members of the Board of
Renata ("ATR") in 2014. The President Director and the former are committed by Commissioners, and the
alleged article is Article 2 Director of Operations for the 2014- individuals not by Board of Directors by the
paragraph (1) jo. Article 18 of 2015 period who had been found corporations so that relevant authorities.
Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning guilty of committing a crime based all services provided
the Eradication of Corruption on a first-degree decision at Central to customers continue
Crimes as amended by Law Jakarta District Court in May 2021 to run normally as
no. 20 of 2001 concerning is currently filing an appeal against they should following
the Eradication of Corruption the decision of the DKI Jakarta applicable regulations.
Crimes jo. Article 55 paragraph High Court at the appeal level
(1) of the 1st Criminal Code jo. which confirms the decision of the
Article 65 paragraph (1) of the Central Jakarta District Court
Criminal Code
2 Dugaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada saat laporan tahunan ini Tidak berdampak Tidak ada sanksi
dalam pemberian fasilitas dibuat, proses hukum yang terhadap kegiatan administratif yang
pembiayaan dari PT Danareksa berlangsung yaitu masing-masing usaha dan aktivitas dikenakan pada Perusahaan,
Sekuritas kepada Debitur terpidana antara lain Mantan perusahaan mengingat Anggota Dewan Komisaris
PT Evio Securities ("Evio") Direktur Utama dan Mantan tindak pidana dan Direksi yang menjabat
pada tahun 2015. Pasal yang Direktur Retail periode 2014- dilakukan oleh individu saat ini oleh Otoritas terkait.
dituduhkan Pasal 3 jo. Pasal 2015 yang telah diputus terbukti atau perseorangan
18 ayat (2), (3) UU No. 31 Tahun bersalah melakukan tindak pidana bukan oleh korporasi
1999 tentang Pemberantasan berdasarkan putusan tingkat sehingga seluruh
Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang pertama di Pengadilan Negeri layanan dan jasa yang
diubah dengan UU No. 20 Tahun Jakarta Pusat pada bulan Mei 2021 diberikan kepada
2001 tentang Pemberantasan sedang mengajukan upaya hukum nasabah tetap berjalan
Tindak Pidana Korupsi jo. Pasal kasasi atas putusan Pengadilan normal sebagaimana
55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP Tinggi DKI Jakarta pada tingkat mestinya sesuai
banding yang menguatkan putusan dengan peraturan yang
PN Jakarta Pusat berlaku
Alleged Corruption in the At the time this annual report No impact on business There are no administrative
provision of financing facilities was prepared, the ongoing legal activities and Company sanctions imposed on
from PT Danareksa Sekuritas process was that each of the activities considering the Company, the current
to Debtors of PT Evio Securities convicts, including the former that criminal acts members of the Board of
("Evio") in 2015. Article 3 jo. President Director and the former are committed by Commissioners, and the
Article 18 paragraph (2), (3) of Retail Director for the 2014-2015 individuals not by Board of Directors by the
Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning period who had been found guilty corporations so that relevant authorities.
the Eradication of Corruption of committing a crime based on a all services provided
Crimes as amended by Law first-degree decision at the Central to customers continue
no. 20 of 2001 concerning Jakarta District Court in May 2021, to run normally as
the Eradication of Corruption was currently filing legal action they should following
Crimes jo. Article 55 paragraph cassation on the decision of DKI applicable regulations.
(1) of the 1st Criminal Code Jakarta High Court at the appeal
level which upheld the decision of
the Central Jakarta District Court

Annual Report 2021
185 PT BRI Danareksa Sekuritas